In a shocking revelation that has sparked controversy, a Nigerian lady has come forward to claim that the lack of support for an Ekiti Chef's attempt to break Hilda Baci's record is solely due to her financial status.
The lady, whose identity remains undisclosed, made these claims, further stirring the pot in the ongoing culinary competition.
According to the lady, who took to social media to express her views, Nigerians are unjustly favoring Hilda Baci, a renowned chef, over the lesser-known Ekiti Chef simply because of her financial circumstances.
She argues that the Ekiti Chef's aspirations to surpass Hilda Baci's achievements are being undermined due to her perceived lack of wealth.
The controversy surrounding this revelation has divided public opinion.
Some have condemned the alleged bias, arguing that talent and passion should be the determining factors in such competitions, irrespective of a person's financial background.
Others, however, have questioned the validity of the claim, suggesting that it may be a mere assumption rather than a reflection of the actual sentiments of the Nigerian population.
The ongoing battle between the two chefs has already captivated the culinary world, with supporters of both sides eagerly following their progress.
As news of the Nigerian lady's revelation spreads, discussions on social media platforms are intensifying.
Reacting...
One user @omalichawa said;
"Y'all playing the victim and pity card..anyways u guys won't coerce us into doing some"
Another user @michaelt2626 wrote;
"Abeg which record is she trying to break? The one Hilda is yet to receive or the one the Indian is still holding? We like to justify nonsense in this country small thing they will say because you're rich like they swear for you and your family not to be rich"
@kalculus_comedy added;
"We didn't know she was poor until you mentioned"
@wendy_adamma commented;
She is poorrrr? You just told us.
@veevogee added;
"It has nothing to do with money. Make all of una rest. Anybody wey GWR recognize make im win"
See below;
Comments